Doctor Who
10 million people tuned in to watch the new, long awaited series of Doctor Who on Saturday. Of those, only about 6 of us seemed to be ‘bloggers and written a review on their weblog. Sort it out people! You’re geeks - stop trying to have a life and watch some low budget British Sci-Fi for a change.
LivingTV (or UKTV or UKTV Gold or Dr Who TV or one of the 90 billion channels that are now fed into my living room) had a Dr Who retrospective on Saturday. All day. It was interesting to dip in and out of in between whatever other chores I was doing as they showed episodes from nearly all the incarnations from Hartnell through to McCoy. The two things I thought were a) hasn’t Colin Baker aged really badly and b) they were like all BBC sci-fi, not as good as you remembered. Mind you, having met a couple of people who used to be involved in things like Blakes 7 and the like, I can totally understand that. Put it this way, unlike American TV shows where they could get divert budget from one episode to fund another, the Beeb used to say “Here’s your wardrobe and make up budget, all £7.94 of it. Spend it wisely.” Now if you only had 2 people to dress then that’s great - you had nearly £4 per person to spend. But if you had 10 people to spend it on, you didn’t get any more and you only had less than 80p to spend on each actor. BBC Sci-fi was a lesson in making do with what you’ve got and doing epic storylines with no money. Fortunately, in a lot of cases, the writing was good enough to hold it all together.
Now, back on topic. Yes, I watched the 9th reincarnation of Doctor Who. I liked it. It made me laugh and, above all else, entertained me. Christopher Eccleston was charming as the geeky new doctor who might have a relatively normal and trendy dress sense but has a maniacal twist to his alien eccentricity that totally sets him apart from his predecessors. He’s a doctor who actually looks like he’d enjoy a pint down the local (or, judging from the near permanent rictus grin that smacked of drug addled lunacy, down the local nightclub). The script made him laconic and not very prone to tedious exposition. Well let’s face it, apart from his new assistant, who doesn’t know about his Gallifreyan heritage. He was given some cracking dialogue too. The exchange between him and Rose’s mother was brilliant:
Rose’s mother
I’m in my dressing gown
The Doctor
Yes. You are.
Rose’s mother
There’s a strange man in my bedroom
The Doctor
Yes. There is.
Rose’s mother
Well anything could happen
The Doctor
Uh, no.
Billie Piper’s turn as the Doctor’s new assistant was surprisingly competent and she proved herself capable as an actress and on a par with the experienced Eccleston. Most of the episode focused on us finding out more about her and her motivations (which isn’t surprising considering the episode was titled “Rose”) but her defining moment comes during the rather lacklustre climax to the epsiode as brightened by Rose’s rallying cry as she attempts to save the day:
Rose
I’ve got no A-levels, no job, no future. But I tell you what I have got - Chiltern Street Junior School Under 7s Gymmastic Team. I got the bronze
This is definitely a Doctor Who for the new millenium and it embraces the information age with gusto. It is self referential and witty in the same vein that marked out Buffy The Vampire Slayer from most of it’s ilk (although whether it will retain any of the Pathos which juxtaposed the humour and pop culture in-jokes of Joss Whedon’s creation is yet to be seen.) It still retains the camp and over the top nature of the old series (listen out for the Avengeresque riff during Rose’s heroine dash at the end) and the slightly ludicrous aliens (seeing Rose’s boyfriend getting eaten by a rubbish bin was hysterical) but rather than pretend it’s something it’s not, it embraces it with gusto. In the words of the new Doctor himself, “Fantastic!”

OR, it’s just not that good? Are we (well you and others) letting sentiment paint a rose (pun intended) coloured hue over things? If Dr.Who hadn’t existed before what would you think?
There is a fine line between appeasing fans and creating something new and I think the former was the major influence, in this first episode at least. It’ll be really good if they change it over the series but on first impressions they’ve got a fair amount of work to do.
I have Sky+, why would I watch this instead of something else?? Gimme a reason BBC, gimme a reason!!
Comment by Gordon — March 30, 2005 @ 12:40 pm
What didn’t you like about it, Gordon?
Comment by BF — March 30, 2005 @ 2:13 pm
I loved it! Maybe a bit more for its promise than for that particular episode, though, but I’m looking forward to Piper & Eccleston developing their characters & relationship.
The thing I always enjoyed about Dr Who was the silliness and the fact it didn’t take itself half as seriously as some of the fans did. It always struck me as the televisual equivalent of those ‘what if, right…’ conversations or dreams - tearing off to have a laugh telling the story and telling it well, without letting lack of budget get in the way. In other words, it looked fun and was well-scripted, and they seem to have retained that so far.
And that killer wheelie bin had me giggling myself off the sofa and onto the floor, to the bemusement of my other half just just never ‘got’ Dr Who in the first place. Potaytoes, potahtoes…
Comment by Cat — March 30, 2005 @ 2:16 pm
Gordon - that’s a good question. I don’t think I am letting sentiment get the better of me because in watching some re-runs of old episodes, I don’t feel any nostalgia for them. In fact, they bore me on the most part. This didn’t. I actually expected it to be worse than it was.
Having said that, I’m interested to see where it goes and I can’t say that I don’t have my doubts about where it’s going to head and whether they will take it in a new direction. Obviously it already is in the fact that they’ve done away with the cliffhanger endings and that they’ve already given more background and characterization to the assistant than any that I’m previously aware of.
Comment by T. — March 30, 2005 @ 5:06 pm
Good point about nostalgia. I too have watched some older eps recently and been bored to tears, even with Tom “The Beloved” Baker. (Although having said that, perhaps I should look up Sylvester McCoy’s eps.) I think my mad crush on Eccleston (ears and all) has a lot to do with my positive reaction to Saturday’s show. But I still always think of him as very serious (SHALLOW GRAVE, pre-going mad; ELIZABETH; the lieutenant on CRACKER). To see him goofy and grinning was a LOT of fun! I feel like his Doctor is really his own, not a pastiche or parody of them who came before.
PS, live in the US, but was able to Torrent Saturday’s episode. Broadband - LOVE IT! Hope all you kind souls over there keep posting those links!
Comment by Elle Wiz — March 30, 2005 @ 5:24 pm
Well I’m a UK blogger who not only wrote a review of the first episode but has gone on to give fair mention to ‘The Unquiet Dead’ and ‘Dalek’. I will no doubt be mentioning it again as I am a massive fan of the way the BBC has approached this new series. It certainly takes from Buffy but nothing wrong with learning from masters such as Joss Whedon. Great blog, by the way - you’re now added to my blogroll. Thanks for some great writing.
Comment by Andy — May 22, 2005 @ 6:14 pm