The Dark Knight (USA, 2008)
As I slipped into my black armoured jacket, pulled on my mask and fired up the ignition, I had to remind myself that I am not, in fact, Batman and that my bike is not, in fact, the Batpod and does not come equipped with missile launchers with which I can blast cars out of the way as I speed back home to the Batcave - err, my flat.
The Dark Knight is fucking awesome. There, I’ve said it. I don’t really need to say anymore because that’s all you need to know and all I can get my head around to tell you. Ah, what the hell - here’s some more (surprisingly spoiler free) thoughts.
First up: is Heath Ledger as good as they say? Yes, yes he is. His take on the Joker really is a pleasure to behold.
Secondly: the minor criticisms I had about Batman Begins revolved around the slightly ham fisted nature of script in dealing with the theme of fear and the action sequences. This time around, the Nolan brothers took on the writing and quite frankly knocked it out of the ball park. There are plenty of themes but rather than smack you in the face until your eyes bleed, the thematic elements are ever so subtly played and work in context. There are some great character moments and it’s entirely true that the supporting characters also get enough time to actually be more fleshed out than you’d otherwise expect. This is a comic book film where none of the characters actually feel like comic characters. With regard to the action sequences, Nolan still can’t really do close up and intimate action sequences (like fist fights) but seems to have accepted this and worked with it so that you don’t notice as much.
It is a far better film than the first (and I take back what I said about Katie Holmes’ as Rachel Dawes because subsequent viewings have made me regret saying that. Maggie Gyllenhall is so much better in comparison). It takes the characters to a new place while being careful to not retread what has already gone. I said originally that Batman Begins was intelligent and I stand by that remark. The Dark Knight makes it look like a cheap, tacky popcorn movie. Direction is excellent (and I was most impressed at the Hong Kong scenes because they gave a damn good indication of how impressive that city is) and Nolan demonstrates that he’s qutie capable of doing epic blockbuster as well as - if not better than - anyone else.
If I have any criticism it’s that Nolan has dug a great big hole that is going to be difficult for either him, or anyone else, to get out of. Of course there’s going to be a third part of this reboot but it’s difficult to see how they’re going to follow this up. For a star, what villain do you follow Ledger’s Joker with? Comparisons are inevitable and quite frankly it’s difficult to concieve of a character that will a) fit into Nolan’s realist vision of Gotham and b) provide half as much menace or intensity as the Joker and that’s even before you get to a casting decision. (If anyone dares mention The Penguin, I will slap the backs of their legs.) I know I’m too close to this to feel it but I almost feel that they should just draw a line under this and move on. On the other hand, I think if anyone can follow this, it will be the Nolans and they’ll find an interesting way of keeping it going and new themes to explore.
If you’ve got this far. Well done. More fool you though because really, all you need to know is that it’s a fucking awesome film and you should go and see it.

The original Penguin was not supernatural, he was just an ugly businessman, a white collar criminal. I don’t see why that wouldn’t fit into Nolan’s Batman- if anything, he’d be the most appropriate choice.
Comment by Destructor — July 25, 2008 @ 2:30 am
I don’t think I’ve ever thought about The Penguin as being supernatural so don’t have a problem with it that way. It’s more about what makes the Penguin recognisable - top hat, monocle, cigarette holder. I also believe that Nolan said in an interview with Esquire magazine he couldn’t see a way of getting that character into his vision of Batman. The Riddler could definitely work, I think. I’d be interested to see a version of Catwoman in this incarnation as well.
Comment by Tom — July 25, 2008 @ 7:40 am
I didn’t really enjoy Batman Begins much, and wasn’t sure about this one. I think part of that was the hype machine that the studio have in motion, and the way Heath Ledger was being used in that (though no doubt he’ll be amazing, he always was). However, I keep reading reviews like this and I’m starting to get exited about it… Hmm.
Comment by Laura — July 25, 2008 @ 9:01 am
exited? excited.
Comment by Laura — July 25, 2008 @ 9:01 am
It depends on what it was about Batman Begins that you didn’t like. A significant advantage that TDK has over BB is that it isn’t constrained by any origin stories. I hope you do enjoy it - regardless of the hype - although I’ll be more interested if you don’t and the reasons why not. I’m swayed by liking the character of Batman and I think this is a Batman film that finally rivals the graphic novels like The Dark Knight Returns and Alan Moore’s seminal “Batman: Killing Joke” (both of which quite obviously influenced the film). Of course, if you’re not as geek as me, you won’t know those but they are good.
Comment by Tom — July 25, 2008 @ 10:07 am
Well, considering that Harvey Dent is in this one (Bear in mind I haven’t seen it yet) isn’t it likely that Two-face will be the main thing in the third one? Or is that all tied up in TDK ?
Mind you, I still say that you could have great fun taking the entire Batman storyline and then adding to it - for example, a Batman version of Spiderman’s Venom (only done much, much, much better, natch) - but the entire “evil twin” thing could sit well with the obvious current Wayne/Batman schizoid psychosis anyway. And it’s far from outside Bale’s acting abilities to play two characters that you don’t even realise are related (cf. The Prestige)
Comment by Lyle — July 25, 2008 @ 11:06 am
Lyle - in the interests of reamining spoiler free, I will decline to address the topic of Harvey Dent apart from saying that Aaron Eckhart was also superb and the character was very well done. As to whether Two-Face is in the third film, all I will say is that Nolan has managed to get two villains into each film so far with some success.
Comment by Tom — July 25, 2008 @ 12:45 pm
Haven’t seen it yet, am going to wait until next weekend.
I think Harley Quinn would be a great villain in this new franchise, and I would love to see what Nolan would do with The Ventriloquist/Scarface (my favourite Batman villain) but someone like Talia Al Ghul is much more likely. And yeah, the Riddler is very, very likely.
Comment by Matt — July 25, 2008 @ 1:06 pm
I too concur!
I love Batman Begins, it is an intelligent comic book movie but compared to the richness and sophistication of The Dark Knight, watching it now would be like watching The Fantastic Four.
I also agree that Nolan may have a dug a big great hole for himself. The advantage of the Joker (and what is so brillantly depicted in this film - it rivals The Killing Joke)over the rest of Batman’s rogues’ gallery is that he is more than a villain with just some quirks, e.g. telling riddles before each committing each crime - he is a fully fleshed character. It is also difficult to see how a character like the Penguin could bring a darkness to a movie like the Joker does. For the third film I could imagine Bane working well. Although not a particularly interesting villain, he would take Batman/Bruce Wayne in an interesting direction and thematically I think he would work well. All of Batman’s previous tests have been mental. He has fallen, but he has picked himself up again. But can he pick himself up,if he cannot walk?
Comment by Dave — July 25, 2008 @ 3:03 pm